Observations

Month

November 2011

82 posts

And award for douchiest costume tonight goes to...

…tent boy, who I just passed in my car on the way home, so no pictures, sorry.  But he was literally wearing a tent, with signs on it that said things like “I’m not protesting, I’m camping” and “Will work for food, as long as I don’t actually have to work” and “If I had a job, I would be protesting.”

Because the Occupy movement is clearly just a bunch of jobless, lazy, unmotivated fuck-offs who have nothing better to do than set up and maintain functioning, well-organized miniature societies all around the nation for weeks on end.

OWS isn’t perfect, and you can take issue with it if you have valid criticisms.  But dismissing it out of hand like that?  Sorry, but no.

People piss me off sometimes.

Nov 1, 20111 note
#OWS #Occupy #Occupy Portland #halloween #douchiness #idiotry #Occupy Wallstreet #costumes

October 2011

135 posts

Oct 31, 2011351 notes
#Manos: Hands of Fate #MST3K #halloween #awesome
Real women → hanneblank.com

thebottomofthecoffeecup:

Excuse me while I throw this down, I’m old and cranky and tired of hearing the idiocy repeated by people who ought to know better.

Real women do not have curves.   Real women do not look like just one thing.

Real women have curves, and not.   They are tall, and not.  They are brown-skinned, and olive-skinned, and not.  They have small breasts, and big ones, and no breasts whatsoever.

Real women start their lives as baby girls.  And as baby boys.  And as babies of indeterminate biological sex whose bodies terrify their doctors and families into making all kinds of very sudden decisions.

Real women have big hands and small hands and long elegant fingers and short stubby fingers and manicures and broken nails with dirt under them.

Real women have armpit hair and leg hair and pubic hair and facial hair and chest hair and sexy moustaches and full, luxuriant beards.  Real women have none of these things, spontaneously or as the result of intentional change.  Real women are bald as eggs, by chance and by choice and by chemo.  Real women have hair so long they can sit on it.  Real women wear wigs and weaves and extensions and kufi and do-rags and hairnets and hijab and headscarves and hats and yarmulkes and textured rubber swim caps with the plastic flowers on the sides.

Real women wear high heels and skirts.  Or not.

Real women are feminine and smell good and they are masculine and smell good and they are androgynous and smell good, except when they don’t smell so good, but that can be changed if desired because real women change stuff when they want to.

Real women have ovaries.  Unless they don’t, and sometimes they don’t because they were born that way and sometimes they don’t because they had to have their ovaries removed.  Real women have uteruses, unless they don’t, see above.  Real women have vaginas and clitorises and XX sex chromosomes and high estrogen levels, they ovulate and menstruate and can get pregnant and have babies. Except sometimes not, for a rather spectacular array of reasons both spontaneous and induced.

Real women are fat.  And thin.  And both, and neither, and otherwise.  Doesn’t make them any less real.

There is a phrase I wish I could engrave upon the hearts of every single person, everywhere in the world, and it is this sentence which comes from the genius lips of the grand and eloquent Mr. Glenn Marla:

There is no wrong way to have a body.


I’m going to say it again because it’s important: There is no wrong way to have a body.

And if your moral compass points in any way, shape, or form to equality, you need to get this through your thick skull and stop with the “real women are like such-and-so” crap.

You are not the authority on what “real” human beings are, and who qualifies as “real” and on what basis.  All human beings are real.

Yes, I know you’re tired of feeling disenfranchised.  It is a tiresome and loathsome thing to be and to feel.  But the tit-for-tat disenfranchisement of others is not going to solve that problem.  Solidarity has to start somewhere and it might as well be with you and me.

Oct 31, 2011334 notes
#body #feminism #solidarity #From Hanne Blank's blog
Oct 31, 201114 notes
#doctor who #sue from catering #can't stop won't stop #bestof
Oct 31, 201112 notes
#halloween #2011 #Doctor Who #Harry Potter #Matt Smith #Hermione #Anna #real life #personal #gpoy

image

arewomenhuman replied to your photo: For all my bluster that I have a theology I could…

Do you still identify as Christian? Sorry, I’m sure you’ve mentioned this recently, I’ve just missed some of your posts on the subject >.<

No need to apologize - I don’t post directly about faith on Tumblr very often, and I’m pretty vague about labels at this point.  I don’t identify as Christian any more.  I need to write a good post on my faith blog about it.

But quickly, I’m certainly not anti-Christian - I’ve half-seriously considered labelling myself a “Christian sympathizer” or perhaps “Christian ally”.  I just can’t honestly include myself any more.  I like to refer to myself as functionally atheist - meaning I behave as if there isn’t a God, but don’t really have any strong opinions on the matter, and have great respect for many people of faith.  Some would call me agnostic, Redditors would call me an agnostic atheist.  I call myself “me” (or “I”, depending on where it is in the sentence).

Oct 31, 20113 notes
#arewomenhuman
Oct 31, 201114 notes
#relevant #PostSecret #God #theology #Christianity
Oct 31, 201110 notes
#750words #writing
Oct 30, 2011307 notes
#Christopher Eccleston #ninth doctor #doctor who #Just this once everybody lives
Play
Oct 30, 201163 notes
#david tennant #hes just so happy to be there #500 miles #christopher eccleston #matt smith #doctor who
Unpopular opinion

…that might also be construed as other things, but.

There’s a poster in my apartment that says I AM SCOTT OLSEN in big letters, and underneath, smaller letters describing him as being “shot in the head by Oakland PD”.

Maybe it’s just me, but that word choice, while maybe technically correct (no one knows for sure) seems gratuitously sensationalistic to the point of deception when describing someone who, by all indications, got hit by a stray tear gas canister.

Yes, he was hit hard, and suffered very serious brain injury, and this possible misuse of force is not to be taken lightly - but I don’t think misrepresenting the facts to make it seem even worse helps anyone. I have more feelings about this kind of thing, but don’t have the energy to say any more than that.

Oct 30, 20118 notes
#feelings #opinion #occupy Oakland #Scott Olsen
Oct 28, 20111,336 notes

image

arewomenhuman replied to your post: tumblingdownthestairsofyourheart replied to your…

I *loved* Eccleston. I still miss him, too. I really like Matt Smith, especially in season 5. He does the whole “I look really young but I’m really really old” bit quite well. And he brings whimsy :-D Tennant was OK, but too emo for me.

Heh, I’m glad I’m not the only one.  I think after I catch up, I’m going to go back and watch Series 1 again, to relive the Eccleston days.  And Matt Smith…combined with Amy, it’s just too much whimsy and silliness for me.  Tennant’s Doctor was indeed emo, but imo was generally (if not always) really good about justifying his emo with the existential weight of being a Time Lord.

Eccleston was also generally more whimsical/silly than Tennant (his mischievous grin was priceless), but I felt like it was more connected to the flipside of things, whereas Smith just seems to ignore that whole bit.

Oct 28, 20111 note
#arewomenhuman #existential weight of being a Time Lord #yup #that's what I said #Doctor Who #David Tennant #Christopher Eccleston #Matt Smith #opinions
Oct 28, 201165,924 notes
#Statue of Liberty #webcams #125th anniversary
Oct 28, 20112 notes
#Wikipedia #I love you #Portland #PDX #[citation needed] #Keep Portland Weird #leisure activities and the local government #bestof

image

tumblingdownthestairsofyourheart replied to your post: Matt Smith! Thoughts? ;D

Three words for you (as I agree with most of this): Tennant was OKAY? OKAYYYY??????

Ha, that was four words.  Or, three words and an utterance.  Tennant was great.  He was really great.  I have a big spot in my heart for Tennant.  He was brilliant, and I greatly enjoyed all of the time.  I’m just a little bitter, because Eccleston really was fantastic, and I miss him.

Also, I added more Tumblr tips to my previous answer.  You should make sure to read them.

Oct 28, 20114 notes
#tumblingdownthestairsofyourheart #Christopher Eccleston #David Tennant #Doctor who
joel look at the notes on the résumé quote...

Haha I don’t know if I noticed that, but mostly I wanted to reblog it so that it would be right next to the other thing I blogged from The Week, which I read a couple weeks ago.

I was wondering what all the reblogging was about…glad you found it.  For future reference, search is terribly broken, but I try to tag stuff well, so you could have found that by just going to cincodenada.tumblr.com/tagged/john barrowman.  And if that fails (as it often will), there’s the archive that is easier to look through as well.  There’s some more Tumblr wisdom for you…welcome!

P.S. The Week is a fantastic magazine with a great Tumblr.  I recommend the Tumblr, their website, and their print magazine - well worth the non-negligible price.

Oct 28, 20111 note
Matt Smith! Thoughts? ;D

My first real anonymous ask!  Oh my, so exciting.  Umm.  Matt Smith…I’m only six episodes into the fifth season, so I don’t have too much a reference.  But Smith himself…I find him annoying.  Too cavalier.  He’s over the line of being dismissive and manic that Tennant toed well.  He hasn’t really dealt with the pathos of being a Timelord at all so far, it’s all skipping through time, matchmaking, flipping his little screwdriver around, saying cute funny British things.

And really, I’m still pissed that Eccleston only got one season, because he was awesome.  Tennant was okay, and damn did he go out with an emotional, fantastic, wonderfully-acted bang (or, really, an unmatchable whimper), but I’ll always have a special spot for Eccleston.

That said, my biggest issue with this season is Amy.  She’s dumb, she asks all the most obvious questions that you’re supposed to have already figured out, and she is congratulated and just so proud of herself when she accidentally trips over the solution to a problem.  Rory, however, I met last episode, and I love that kid.  He’s everything that Amy and Matt aren’t, and I’m really excited to see what he does to the dynamics of things.

All that said, I am dressing up as Smith for halloween, mostly because I keep being told I look like him.  So I don’t hate him too much :P

Oct 28, 201110 notes
#Matt Smith #anonymous #David Tennant #Christopher Eccleston #9th #10th #11th #Doctor who #Amy Pond #Rory Williams
“One version of the résumé suggested that the applicant was gay. The other did not. Otherwise, they were all but identical. The results? The gay “applicant” was 40 percent less likely to get called in for an interview. The “gay” résumé listed a stint as treasurer of a collegiate gay organization. To separate any “gay penalty” from general anti-liberal political bias on the employers’ part, Tilcsik listed involvement with a “progressive and socialist alliance” on the other set of résumés in place of the gay group.” —The Week, on a study by Harvard researcher András Tilcsik.
Oct 28, 20115 notes
#heterosexism #bias #gay #lgbt #privelege #The Week
“What we did is, we made up 5000 resumes: on half of them we put an African American name, on half of them we put a white name. Otherwise, the resumes were exactly the same. Then we sent them out. Which got called back more? What we found was that the same resume, when it had an African American name, was 33% less likely to get an interview than when it had a white name. So if a white person is searching for a job for ten weeks, an equivalently skilled African American person will be searching for fifteen weeks. Those are five long weeks if you’re unemployed.” —Dr. Sendhil Mullainathan, Harvard University Professor of Economics, Freakonomics (via cocknbull)
Oct 28, 2011874 notes
#facts #freakonomics #privilege #race #racism #Sendhil Mullainathan
Next page →
2012 2013
  • January 55
  • February 80
  • March 66
  • April 78
  • May 56
  • June 23
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
2011 2012 2013
  • January 139
  • February 85
  • March 72
  • April 66
  • May 106
  • June 85
  • July 57
  • August 74
  • September 75
  • October 72
  • November 57
  • December 41
2010 2011 2012
  • January 41
  • February 91
  • March 34
  • April 38
  • May 59
  • June 97
  • July 64
  • August 156
  • September 149
  • October 135
  • November 82
  • December 69
2010 2011
  • January
  • February
  • March 6
  • April 8
  • May 7
  • June 19
  • July 21
  • August 37
  • September 25
  • October 57
  • November 36
  • December 25